report here the answer I gave to a boy who asked in the forum if they build in wood costs more or less of a brick house and if the time agrees. I'd like to read your comments and opinions on:
" This is my opinion (non-technical):
I believe that to build up a good wooden house you have to spend at least what you pay for a good home in Brick if not more, but will respond with greater certainty as soon as we finish the project and go to collect the final estimates from the companies I have selected.
I also believe that a wooden house, at least in the coming years will still have a less salable for a number of reasons: 1
- People are still historically linked to the brick and 10 potential customers looking for a used house I do not know how many are willing to look for a wooden house.
2 - In addition to distrust "wood vs. brick", there is also the danger of being in front of a wooden house built wrong, since it is clear that in today's market companies are born costruttritri like mushrooms, which do not have enough experience in the assembly or use cheap materials in order to promote competition and lower prices so
3 - The wooden house is architecturally the most "technological" and I think we use many different materials together, if only because the various companies to differentiate their love wall to make it "unique" in the eyes of the customer. This has a negative side than the "standard" houses of brick + coat: If a material, for whatever reason, it turns out not to be powerful enough or sustained over time, the house depreciates and loses interest.
4 - As rightly pointed out these are blessed Uterzi energy classes, then a fortiori it is true what was said by M3M, in my opinion! Now construct a class B, but in 10 years the standard of new buildings will house the past (for example) and your house automatically becomes comparable to a car EURO 2 .... in short, the market will be older than it really is.
remains a matter of objective fact: who builds a house, whether wood or brick, with the current economic situation, he does not invest * * (of course, the situation may change even in the short and start building in bomb, maybe ...), but he does use it * * and then exploit it, eat it, live there!
I open a brief parenthesis: I remember as a child, which I visited a friend of mine who lived with his parents, in the damp basement of villone they had built. To go to the upper floors, had to remove their shoes before entering, and only then one could admire the shiny wooden floors, sofas in the living room still packaged, the kitchen has never been used. This situation lasted at least 10 YEARS! But it serves to build a house and then look like a picture? Need to buy a car in the garage and then hold it without using it? Clear ... everyone is free to do whatever he wants, but I think the house must be available to us and not the other way!
short, as when I restored my current home in 2002, will build a new home without calculating what could be worth between 10 or 15 years, because in the meantime will use in every corner of every room and the charges will be fully amortized by the satisfaction in 'housing. "
